On 11/9/14, Rob Seaman <[email protected]> wrote: > It's good to see new names appearing on the leapsecs list. Perhaps new > folks might introduce themselves and describe the interest of their > institutions in the proposed redefinition of UTC? > > I have some science background, and am into conflict resolution and the role of cognitive dissonance and misinformation. I was warned about this list and that emails could turn negative, but so far I have seen nothing of the sort. Thank you for your patience. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Sanjeev Gupta
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Alex Currant via LEAPSECS
- [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC repo... Rob Seaman
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Alex Currant via LEAPSECS
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Steve Allen
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Rob Seaman
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Athena Madeleina
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Steve Allen
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Rob Seaman
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Nero Imhard
- Re: [LEAPSECS] IAU UTC ... Athena Madeleina
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Ian Batten via LEAPSECS
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Warner Losh
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Warner Losh
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big ... Harlan Stenn
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery Harlan Stenn
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery Harlan Stenn
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery michael.deckers via LEAPSECS
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery Sanjeev Gupta
- Re: [LEAPSECS] the big artillery Magnus Danielson
