Since UTC is defined by the IERS before 1972-01-01 "beginning_of_utc" is not 
appropriate.
This is the beginning of integer leap seconds, not UTC.
How about "leap_second_epoch" or if the term epoch is undesirable "leap_seconds_origin" 
labelled as "leap00"

Stephen*
*

On 2015-01-25 13:11, Rob Seaman wrote:
Makes sense (and the danger of list processing).  If no further correction I'll shift all 
the leapNN names to start from June 1972.  Are we all agreed that it is correct to say 
that the beginning of UTC is 1972-01-01T00:00:00Z with TAI-UTC 10s at that moment?  If 
so, I'll introduce another name with the same value as the current leap01 but called 
something like "beginning_of_utc" or some such.

Thanks!

Rob
--

On Jan 25, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS 
<[email protected]> wrote:


  On 2015-01-25 14:58, Rob Seaman wrote:

Please let me know about typos, suggestions, etc.  Needless to say this
  remains a prototype.
...
YYYY MM before  after  encoded crc         IP              Decoded        flags
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1972  1      9     10 f8000a00  f5  248.0.10.245    -> OK 1972  1  10  1  (1, 0)
  It would be incorrect to consider the discontinuity of the difference
  TAI - UTC at the epoch when TAI was 1972-01-01T00:00:10 as a leap second;
  the difference increased by about 0.108 s, not by 1 s. Hence, a timestamp
  such as "1971-12-31T23:59:60.2Z" should not be made acceptable.

  The first leap second occurred when UTC reached 1972-07-01; the information
  about a leap second says something about TAI - UTC both before and after
  the date referenced. At 1972-01-01, however, the information can only say
  something about TAI - UTC for TAI on or after 1972-01-01T00:00:10, but
  nothing (correct) for smaller values of TAI.

  Michael Deckers.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to