The AP has been publishing its video archives. One snip contains their coverage of the 2012 ITU-R Radiocommnication Assembly vote, or rather, lack of vote, on the draft proposal to abandon leap seconds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez8HG_bCLno
The Australian Communications and Media Authority still has its web page showing the APG15-4 session that was held at the APT meeting in Bangkok during February. http://www.acma.gov.au/Industry/Spectrum/Spectrum-planning/International-planning-ITU-and-other-international-planning-bodies/wrc-15-agenda-item-114 That web page originally had the methods A1, A2, B, C1, and C2 from the CPM sessions held during 2014. Since the CPM15-2 meeting in March/April it also includes method D. The CPM web page at ITU http://www.itu.int/md/R12-CPM15.02-C-0111/en shows that method D was proposed by 6 nations: UAE, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Sudan. The European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations gives a view into the other proposed methods. They have several documents giving the current status, full draft text, and analysis of the pros and cons of the various methods at http://www.cept.org/ecc/groups/ecc/cpg/page/cept-briefs-and-ecps-for-wrc-15 Method A is supported by France. Method C is supported by Russia. I am certain that the diplomats are continuing to negotiate. -- Steve Allen <[email protected]> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
