On Thu 2015-10-29T19:23:36 +0000, Richard Langley hath writ: > The article is wrong. Canada has not taken a position for (or against) doing > away with leap seconds.
CITEL is against the leap second, and Canada is part of CITEL. So that's different than CEPT where UK and Russia prevented a regional position from being reached. -- Steve Allen <[email protected]> WGS-84 (GPS) UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855 1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015 Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
