On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 15:13 -0400, Brooks Harris wrote: > > I understand. But its always seemed to me those old formats should > be obsolesced, that ISO 8601 presented an attractive alternative, > that the YMDhms order made such good sense. Of course formats must > remain reverse compatible, so they've proably had to stick with what > they'd done. But in your case the whole timescale is new (wait, maybe > its old? :-) ) so its an opportunity to suggest adopting a more > sensible and modern lexicon. > -Brooks > Since the Gregorian dates appear only as comments they could be changed easily. Perhaps we should show both forms. What do other people on this list think should be done? John Sauter ([email protected]) -- PGP fingerprint = E24A D25B E5FE 4914 A603 49EC 7030 3EA1 9A0B 511E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
