Tom Van Baak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Does your proposal allow for a Zero leap second > > Nope, LSEM avoids the zero leap second situation. That's the idea: to > always have a leap second. Either an add or a delete, at the end of > every month. The beauty is that it wouldn't violate how UTC is already > defined.
Isn't the limit on DUTC 0.9s? So you can't have a leap second at the end of the month when | UT1 - UTC | < 0.1 Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ - I xn--zr8h punycode Fisher, German Bight: Variable, mainly north, 3 or 4. Slight. Thundery showers, fog patches in east. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor in east. _______________________________________________ LEAPSECS mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
