On 2019-01-01 9:36 AM, Philip Newton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 at 15:33, Daniel R. Tobias <[email protected]> wrote:
A lot of Americans synchronize their new year celebrations to the
drop of the ball in Times Square as seen on TV, which means they
celebrate a few seconds late because digital TV has an inherent delay
to it (for signal encoding or something... I really don't know the
technical details).
You used to hear that during major sports events as well -- there'd be
cheers coming up from various houses, then an echoing cheer a little
bit later when those who had digital rather than analogue TV saw the
goal.
_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs


Back in the days of analog TV (which is still used in some parts of the world) the broadcast TV signal was one of the most stable time sources around. This was necessary because the display of the signal on a CRT TV set depended critically on the timing of the components of the signal, the horizontal and vertical scan lines of each frame (actually two interlaced 'fields').

There were experiments at NIST in the early days of TV to use the TV signal as a time dissemination source. It worked well, as coordinated with the NIST radio time signals. But it didn't turn out to be a practical solution.

All that real-time behavior went away with the advent of digital video and digital TV broadcast. Everything is buffered in some manner, sometimes very short, like parts of the picture scan lines, to entire frames, and, often many frames. There are many processes signals now propogate through, including compression and decompression of various formats, like Mpeg2, which is what we've mostly been watching for many years. New formats, including hi-def etc are constantly being adopted. With each of these stages there is some buffering and delay. And each facility and broadcaster has different equipment and procedures, so its unlikely any two TV signals are synchronous by the time they get to the audience's screens. And each TV set has its own internal buffering which adds more delay, and few of these products match each other in that respect. And, as noted, live broadcasts are often intentionally delayed. "Live" is not really live.

And then there is internet video streaming. In that case of course everything is buffered at many stages through the network and on your computer's desktop. If you've watched some live streamed event you might find it streamed from two or more servers. I've seen 10-20 second delays and more between two "live" streams. And of course there's no telling how much delay has occurred since the physical event in front of the camera.

-Brooks

_______________________________________________
LEAPSECS mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs

Reply via email to