In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Calabretta writes:
>On Tue 2005/08/30 19:46:51 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote
>in a message to: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL
>
>>keep "the clock" as people see it on their wrist [1] in sufficient
>>sync with the light of day through minor acts of timezone adjustments.
>
>If such a system were to be adopted, then in future, in order to
>determine a historical time, the full record of timezone changes would
>be needed.

How is this different than today ?

How is it different from having to keep a total history of leapseconds ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Reply via email to