In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ed Davies writes: >Rob Seaman wrote:
>So I'd say there are really three options being debated: > >1. leap seconds. > >2a. leap hours. > >2b. give lip service to leap hours for now but actually be leap > free in practice. Four really, some of us say: 3. Realize that the Earth is a lousy clock and go entirely atomic. But for all practical purposes the difference between 2b and 3 is not something I (need to) care about. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
