On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Mark Calabretta wrote: > On Mon 2006/01/09 10:38:54 -0000, Peter Bunclark wrote > in a message to: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL > > >I't be interesting to do an FFT on this list, and see if some of the > >contributers actually ever sleep, or do any other work... > > I had the same thought - the moreso when I reflect on the nil response > to my request for a counter-presentation at ADASS. > > (What sort of FFT did you have in mind?) One with a big value of F; unfortunatelly, the high frequencies would be lost because the differing implementations of the workaround for the broken POSIX notion of time make computation of TAI from the email timestamps problematic.
Pete. > > Cheers, Mark >
