On Jan 13, 2006, at 4:20 AM, Ed Davies wrote:

There's nothing in this text which would stop the IERS continuing
to issue leap seconds as they do now except they'd have to do it
five years in advance so would, presumably, have to relax the ±0.9
seconds requirement somewhat.

An excellent point!  Although one fails to see the benefit in a
standard that doesn't constrain behavior.  So one supposes that the
IERS could issue a "leap 37:43"  - in either direction - immediately
after this droll standard takes effect?

Reply via email to