----- Original Message -----
From: "James Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Risks of change to UTC


> M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >             James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > : >             James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > : > : ones position using sight reduction tables.  Today a mechanical
watch or
> > : > : chronometer, or a battery-powered wristwatch, can be set to UTC
using
> > : > : radio time signals. Then when power fails, the sailor still has a
> > : > : reasonably accurate spprodximation to UT1 available.
> > : >
> > : > If DUT1 is broadcast, then one can set the time keeping device to
UT1
> > : > by a means similar to setting it to UTC, even if DUT1 exceeds 0.9s
> > : > with a similar accuacy (or better).  There's nothing that says a
watch
> > : > has to display UTC to be set correctly.
> > : >
> > : > Warner
> > : >
> > : > .
> > : >
> > : And how is DUT1 to be broadcast in a language-independent manner?
That
> > : protocol needs to be established well in advance.
> >
> > It already is being broadcast in, eg, WWV.
> >
> > Warner
> >
> >
> >
> But the protocol for broadcasting DUT1 in, e.g., WWV, does not provide
> for DUT1 values of more than plus or minus 0.9 s.  The value of DUT1
> could be announced by voice message -- but that would not be
> language-independent.  If I travel to asia in my boat, I will not be
> able to benefit from DUT1 announcemnts in Japanese from JJY or in
> Chinese from BPM (or whatever their standard time and frequency station
> is).  An longwave broadcasts such as those from WWVB do not have voice
> modulation at all!
>
WWVB broadcasts the DUT1 correction in binary-coded decimal form, and is
capable of representing DUT1 values up to +/- 1.5 seconds with their current
format.  I would think other longwave stations do the same, but not knowing
their particular BCD format I couldn't say what DUT1 values they are capable
of representing.

Brian Garrett

Reply via email to