Warner Losh scripsit: > This is the biggest misunderstanding [...] an hour off of solar time.
I now abbreviate this whole argument with the word "Kashi". (To reiterate: |LMT-LCT| in Kashi, a city in western China (which has no DST), is about 3 hours.) > > But again, giving up leap seconds in UTC is not the same as > > accepting atomic time as civil time. > > Again, I don't quite understand this statement. Can you elaberate a > bit on the difference? I don't think anyone in the plan #2 camp wants to change UTC as such: some people find it useful. What we want, I think (or at least what I want) is to make TI rather than UTC the foundation of legal local time. -- "Well, I'm back." --Sam John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>