----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:55 PM
Subject: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia article

> Thanks to those who confirmed the ITU text on when leap seconds can
> be applied.
> I've made two small edits to the Wikipedia article to correct
> parts which were wrong or potentially misleading (plus a slightly
> tongue-in-cheek remark in the discussion page)
> However, it's a horrible article and really needs reorganization
> as some of the paragraphs have suffered serious mission creep.
> I don't even like the first sentence.  "Intercalary" seems wrong
> to me as a leap second is part of the day it is applied to, not
> between days.  I thought about changing it but decided I might
> be being a bit blinkered in my definition of "intercalary".
> Thoughts?
> Ed.
The French-language term for leap second is "second intercalaire", so
calling a leap second "intercalary" has a linguistic precedent if nothing
else.  Besides, the English term "leap second" is a misnomer--a leap year is
a year with an extra day in it (and the inserted day is *not* called a leap
day) so by analogy the insertion of a second should probably have been
termed a "leap minute".  But that's all cesium over the dam, now.


Reply via email to