In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
            Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Steve Allen wrote:
: >
: This is the really interesting one.  They present the accuracy of
: simulated predictions of UT1, and that accuracy is much poorer than
: the figures we've been discussing so far.  But they make it clear that
: the prediction is by a naive algorithm, not even applying the well-known
: periodic terms that are used in UT2.  This is obviously not the algorithm
: used by IERS.

The good news is that even an incredibly stupid (in terms of knowledge
used) algorithm can predict almost 3 years out....


Reply via email to