Hi all, A personal aside; I seem to be doing better so hopefully I can be a positive factor in this project.
Anyway, I read the rules and have one suggestion: There is no mechanism for removing problematic committers. Problematic can mean one person who makes the project miserable for the rest, or it can mean someone who commits too many untested patches. I understand the urge to approve a seemingly innocuous change, because properly testing everything takes time, of which we are all in short supply, but I think it would be good if committers were held to the same standards as patch submitters (which is something I saw going awry at times in openwrt). Having an official policy in this regard helps committers avoid the temptation to take shortcuts (I know this is a failing I have to work hard to guard against myself) and assume a seemingly minor change, or quick test, is sufficient. Certainly having my own tree that I don't feel as much urgency to try and get my stuff 'out there' has helped me, and I think the text encouraging the practise is good. One other thing that I think would be helpful is to have an experimental or testing branch to which one could submit RFC patches, if one needs help getting patches tested. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
