Might I submit that my impression is that Kaloz (at least) holds infrastructure hostage to maintain control, and that the fundamental problem here is that OpenWrt is *not* democratic and ignores what people who were ones visibly working on openwrt want and overrides their wishes because he/they has/have the keys.
That doesn't work. Perhaps I'm wrong, but that is certainly my impression. There isn't management for openwrt except by democratic/meritocratic principles, and no one should try to force it to be otherwise. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
