Might I submit that my impression is that Kaloz (at least) holds
infrastructure hostage to maintain control, and that the fundamental
problem here is that OpenWrt is *not* democratic and ignores what people
who were ones visibly working on openwrt want and overrides their wishes
because he/they has/have the keys.

That doesn't work.  Perhaps I'm wrong, but that is certainly my impression.

There isn't management for openwrt except by democratic/meritocratic
principles, and no one should try to force it to be otherwise.

Regards,

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to