On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:13:37AM -0400, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: > On 16-05-20 04:08 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >> > > the whole point of my side sentence was to give a hint that maybe my > > impressions and suggestions are not entirely unfounded or discardable. > > it's up to the reader to check my "creds" if they don't take my word. > > this didn't imply anything in particular about how these communities are > > run, or that lede should copy their modus opandi. > > The problem is that you were using "big openly governed communities" to > suggest that you had experience in how successful openly governed > projects work. If that's not actually the case, then there is no point > to saying what you said, other than to try and *sound* like you know > something you don't. > how exactly is that not covered by what i just said?
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
