Ok, I'll try this and once I confirm that it behaves as expected, I'll
publish the patch here.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:26 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/07/2016 08:45, Jurgen Van Ham wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Procd supports instance_writepid and instance_removepid in the file
>> instance.c.
>> The removepid is called when stopping a daemon or restarting it.
>> However, when a daemon
>> dies and it is not configured to respawn the pidfile is not removed.
>>
>>
>> When other daemon watch the pidfile because they rely on the daemon
>> they cannot rely to stop when the pidfile disappears. This other
>> daemon cannot just continue after procd would respawn the died daemon.
>> Before restarting the procd managed daemon, the depending daemons need
>> to stop.
>>
>> Would a fix in the function instance_exit be the right solution to
>> remove the pid after dying without a configured respawn?
>> Is there a reason to keep a pidfile after a daemon terminates without
>> any procd request.
>
> pidfile support was added at some point and this is a corner case that
> you stumbled across that we failed to add. instance_exit() would be the
> correct place to add this. having had a quick look just addin an else {}
> at the end of the if clause is probably what should be done to fix this
>
> John
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
