On 2016-09-21 20:13, Florian Fainelli wrote: > This patch series adds support for generating valid ld.so.cache which match > the > target architecture, without requiring a cross-compiled version of ldconfig > that would run on the host, nor run on the target. > > Having a proper ld.so.cache might be needed if e.g: 64-bit executable loader > only has /lib64 in its default search path. Can't we simply fix the default search path instead? Or is this a workaround for dealing with external toolchain braindamage?
> At some point, we should probably think about how we want to structure the > rootfs in OpenWrt/LEDE wrt. 32-bit/64-bit libraries but that set of changes is > orthogonal and can be useful on its own. What do we need that for? - Felix _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
