Hi, Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2016, 22:08:06 CEST schrieb Jo-Philipp Wich: > Hi Michael, > > > I can't see why adjusting the default partition size would have been > > necessary > > as genext2fs takes (or better: took) the following parameters: > The filesystem is generated okay but due to the total size : blocksize ratio > there are not enough backup block group descriptor entries left to support > online-resizing the rootfs partition, see > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-dev/2016-September/002518.html > for a report that describes the problem.
I understand the problem and solving this issue would be a great benefit. > I am fine with keeping 4k blocks but in this case we should increase the > default image size to at least the minimum value being able to support > resizing. The report mentions that 512M already work which would allow > resizing up to 512GB (1024 times larger). > > Sorry, but I can only find the default value of 48 MB? Do I miss > > something? > > See > https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source.git;a=blob;f=config/Config-images.in > #l263 > > I don't like reverting to 1k because when you use the image on a real > > device, e.g. eMMC or SD card, then usually the internal blocksize is 4k, > > and internal erase block size is often even 4 MiB. > > Thus using 1k blocksize is not optimal when using a writeable filesystem. > > I understand. As mentioned above, 4K blocks are fine for me too, but in this > case I suggest to bump the rootfs part size to 2GB which would support 2TB > rootfs partitions. > In general, I'm fine with larger default partition size. However, this results in large images available for download at downloads.lede-project.org... mhei _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev