Jo-Philipp Wich <j...@mein.io> wrote: > Hi Alberto, > > personally I like the service wrapper since it alligns the > service handling with Debian and older CentOS / Redhat distros.
If it looks like debian and out of date unsupported centos/redhat, but is actually completely different, is it really helpful to make it look like something it's not? The life of the "service <xxxx> start|stop|status" really wasn't very long. It didn't offer command completion without shell programming, and was simply a rewording of /etc/init.d/xxxx start|stop|status. Redhat based distros moved to systemd, ubuntu went to upstart, and that changed things _again_ Why should openwrt _add_ a duplicate path that needs to be documented and adds little to no value? Sincerley, Karl Palsson
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
