Sidenote: Gateworks devices are the same in the OpenWrt as in the LEDE ToH. https://lede-project.org/toh/start?dataflt%5BBrand*%7E%5D=gatewo https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start?dataflt%5BBrand*%7E%5D=gatewo
The reason why there are less devices listed with "snapshot" in the LEDE ToH: No firmware file listed for them, see https://lede-project.org/toh/views/toh_fwdownload2?dataflt%5BBrand*%7E%5D=ga tewo Thomas > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] Im Auftrag > von Tim Harvey > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016 18:28 > An: John Crispin > Cc: LEDE Development List > Betreff: Re: [LEDE-DEV] gateworks patches in the tree > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:54 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > > > Hi John, > > > we currently have these patches in the tree, which i think you were > > involved in. could you tell us which of these can be sent upstream > > and/or what is blocking us sending them upstream ? > > > > 160-usb-gadget-udc-net2280-add-usb2380-support.patch:From: Tim Harvey > > <thar...@gateworks.com> > > I mainlined this one (5185c91385d73cdf79836eb8548e4726e43ae831) and it > appears in Linux 4.8 > > > 412-mtd-partial_eraseblock_unlock.patch:From: Tim Harvey > > <thar...@gateworks.com> > > The commit message for this applied in OpenWrt r33681 on 10/10/12 was: > > mtd: allow partial block unlock > > This allows sysupgrade for devices such as the Gateworks Avila/Cambria > product families based on the ixp4xx using the redboot bootloader with > combined FIS directory and RedBoot config partitions on larger FLASH > devices with larger eraseblocks. > > This second iteration of this patch addresses previous issues: > - whitespace breakage fixed > - unlock in all scenarios > - simplification and fix logic bug > > ------ > > The ixp4xx Xscale processors have been EOL for a couple of years and as > such there are no plans to mainline this. I don't see Gateworks > Avila/Cambria in the LEDE Table of hardware (they are still in the > OpenWrt list). Perhaps there is a plan to drop ixp4xx support from LEDE > in general, which I would be fine with. > > > 880-gateworks_system_controller.patch:Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey > > <thar...@gateworks.com> > > This is an old driver replaced by a newer version which I intend on > mainlining - drop it. _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
