On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 17:32 +0100, Steven Barth wrote: > Hey everyone, > > > > > Currently known remaining users of polarssl are: > > > > * bmx7 > > * pianod > > * shadowsocks-libev-polarssl > > * shairport-sync-mini > > * shairport-sync-polarssl > > * transmission-cli-polarssl > > * transmission-daemon-polarssl > > * transmission-remote-polarssl > > * umurmur-polarssl > > > > > > Please provide feedback on which approach you'd prefer and if you'd be > > affected by the PolarSSL deprecation or not. > I think for all but the first two from this list, there is a > non-polarssl version already packaged. > Which would mainly leave bmx7 and pianod as main concerns. I think the > former used to work with cyassl > at some point in time and the latter should work with gnutls. Both of > which we have, so it might just > be a minor change to the packaging Makefiles. > > So from my point of view dropping libpolarssl now (with a bit of upfront > notice to the maintainers) > makes more sense than trying to drop a package later which is a bit of > unexpected and am not sure if > it can be effectively announced in a service release and just delays the > inevitable. > > > Cheers, > > Steven > > _______________________________________________ > lede-adm mailing list > lede-...@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm
Drop it now. Speaking for pianod and shairport-sync... I have already updated pianod (which I still develop) to use mbed TLS and I am currently working with the shairport- sync developer to replace PolarSSL with mbed TLS this weekend. /ted _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev