On 23-03-17 19:49, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 23 March 2017 at 18:57, Álvaro Fernández Rojas <nolt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> El 23/03/2017 a las 18:38, Rafał Miłecki escribió: >>> On 2017-03-23 18:29, Felix Fietkau wrote: >>>> On 2017-03-22 21:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl> >>>>> >>>>> Right now all brcm2708 patches are extracted from the non-mainline >>>>> raspberrypi/linux git tree. Many of them are hacks and/or are unneeded >>>>> in LEDE. Raspberry Pi is getting better and better mainline support so >>>>> it would be nice to finally start maintaining patches in a cleaner way: >>>>> 1) Backport patches accepted in upstream tree >>>>> 2) Start using upstream drivers >>>>> 3) Pick only these patches that are needed for more complete support >>>>> >>>>> Handling above tasks requires grouping patches - ideally using the same >>>>> prefixes as generic ones. It means we should rename existing patches to >>>>> use some high prefix. This will allow e.g. use 0xx for backported code. >>>> I agree with the split, but could you please use a number much lower >>>> than 999? ;) >> I also agree with the split, but I have to warn you that I may not be able >> to achieve this right now since I haven't got much free time lately... >> >>> I'd like to have "access" to all standard prefixes: >>> >>> 0xx - upstream backports >>> 1xx - code awaiting upstream merge >>> 2xx - kernel build / config / header patches >>> 3xx - architecture specific patches >>> 4xx - mtd related patches (subsystem and drivers) >>> 5xx - filesystem related patches >>> 6xx - generic network patches >>> 7xx - network / phy driver patches >>> 8xx - other drivers >>> 9xx - uncategorized other patches >> I think those patches fit into the "uncategorized other patches" category so >> why don't we use 900-? > I'd also like to have space for "uncategorized other patches" added > before patches backported from raspberrypi/linux. 950 would allow > using 900-949 numbers for such stuff. And in case we need patches on > top of raspberrypi/linux (as Felix suggested) we may use 951-999. > 950 sounds good to me.
Acked-by: Stijn Tintel <st...@linux-ipv6.be> _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev