> On May 8, 2017, at 7:19 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Felix, Imre and myself had 2 calls last week lasting several hours and > discussed the following proposal of conditions for a remerge that we would > like to propose and have people vote on. > > *) branding > - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand > > - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people > said they did not care > > - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the > only feasible option > > *) domain > - transfer owner ship to SPI for openwrt.org and lede-project.org > - add them to the pool of urls at digital ocean > - post remerge build a setup where we have several DNS servers in various > locations > - point git.openwrt.org at the lede git server > - point bugs.openwrt.org to the lede flyspray instance > - keep both wikis and forums as is (we should decide post remerge how to > proceed to avoid these issues blocking the progress) > - update the lede domain entries for build/download/rsync/... servers so that > the openwrt domain also points at them > > *) SPI > - TBD post remerge > > *) github > - stop pushing to lede-project organisation > - start pushing to the openwrt organisation > - cleanup the list of owners in the openwrt organisation > - obsolete all issues on the openwrt organisation and close the issue tracker > - go through the open openwrt and lede PRs, pickup whats useful and close the > rest, asking people to repost (things wont be rebasable anyhow) > - close the lede PR tracker > - keep the lede organisation in its current state so that forked trees dont > get obsoleted > > - obsolete the lede github org after a grace period of 3-6 months > > *) landing page > - update the lede landing page to represent the openwrt name > - update the landing page to have the same look & feel as the current openwrt > landing page > - point openwrt.org at the lede landing page > > *) trac > - trac is already readonly, keep content so that search engines can still > find the it > - edit the trac html templates, adding a note pointing at the bug.openwrt.org > instance > > *) email accounts > - currently there are around ~20 active openwrt.org mail accounts > - turn all the webmaster@, hostmaster@, ... accounts into aliases that anyone > with voting rights can be subscribed to > - ask those people that are no longer active to voluntarily give up their > accounts > - mail addresses may under no conditions be used for any personal business, > consultancy, applying for jobs, ... purposes > > - any mail sent from an openwrt.org account needs to adhere the trademark > policy and should only be used for FOSS purposes > > > *) wiki / forum > - TBD > - asking in either forum/wiki will get a biased vote so keep them both around > - start a separate discussion regarding these post remerge > > *) LF > - find out what doubts folks have about LF > - find out benefits - we would have their hosting and sponsorship ?! > - start a separate discussion regarding these post remerge > > *) git trees > - rebrand the lede tree to openwrt > - work out what has happened inside the openwrt tree since the reboot and > pick up the useful bits (zoltan has done some prior work on this already) > > *) mailing list > - ask david to add the openwrt-adm and openwrt lists > - announce the switch to the infradead serves, asking people to unsubscribe > if they have privacy issues with this > - import the user DB from the current openwrt and lede ML into the 2 new > mailing lists > - find out if we can redirect/auto-reply the existing lists to the new ones > > *) trademark/sponsorship policy > - review/ack imres trademark policy > - review/ack jows sponsorship policy > > *) timeline > - refine / vote / agree on the proposal withing the next 2 week > - work on the action items in the 4 weeks after that > > John
I’d like to suggest one more action item to this list if I can. It would be handy to have a single database for user authentication/identification for submitting bugs, editing the Wiki, etc. Previously there were too many places where you had to create an account. If we can’t do “single sign-on”, can we at least do “single sign-up”? And part of a user’s profile should include their IRC handle (assuming they have one). Thanks. -Philip _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
