Geert, Am 21.05.2017 um 10:37 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven: > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:36 PM, Ralph Sennhauser > <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There is also the size consideration. Unless a seeded ubifs can get >> close to squashfs in terms of compression there would still be a >> use-case for squashfs with an ubifs overlay. My current root as ubifs >> instead of squashfs is 76.8% bigger. > > As seeded files are stored and kept unmodified, they could be stored in > compressed form?
This is what UBIFS already does. Thanks, //richard _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
