On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Syrone Wong <wong.syr...@gmail.com> wrote: > You'd better mention the move to GitHub on the official webpage: > http://squashfs.sourceforge.net/ >
That GitHub repo is currently the most uptodate repository because people have made pull requests on that repository. It was initially only created as a backup for the time that kernel.org was unavailable. It is not the official repository, which is on kernel.org, but funnily enough I can't merge GitHub requests to that automatically. That has to be done manually. As everyone insists on using the GitHub repo it hasn't been on my priority list. Phillip > > Best Regards, > Syrone Wong > > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Phillip Lougher > <phillip.loug...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 05/26/2017 06:13 PM, Alexander Couzens wrote: >>> squashfs is quite long unmaintained. All patches from major >>> distributions are integrated. >> >> As the maintainer and author of Squashfs that is completely untrue and >> grossly offensive. >> >> Many of those patch-sets are merged (where I have received merge >> requests) into this repository. >> >> https://github.com/plougher/squashfs-tools >> >> Others I don't recognise which means they've never been submitted to >> me. Distributions are entirely entitled to keep local patches which >> they've never submitted to upstream. >> >> Some others including portability patches have been rejected by me. >> >> In both cases their lack of integration does not mean the project is >> not maintained. >> >> Do not make untrue claims. >> >> Cheers >> >> Dr. Phillip Lougher >> Author and Maintainer of Squashfs. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lede-dev mailing list >> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
