John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> writes:

> On 17/01/18 10:54, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018-01-17 10:43, Karl Vogel wrote:
>>> Shows how long an initd task took, for example:
>>>
>>>  procd: stop /etc/init.d/dropbear running - took 0.088824s
>>>  procd: Update service dnsmasq
>>>  procd: Update instance dnsmasq::dnsmasq
>>>  procd: running /etc/init.d/dnsmasq running
>>>  procd: start /etc/init.d/dnsmasq running
>>>  procd: stop /etc/init.d/dnsmasq running - took 0.092586s
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Karl Vogel <karl.vo...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  rcS.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/rcS.c b/rcS.c
>>> index dd3b76d..acfb6a0 100644
>>> --- a/rcS.c
>>> +++ b/rcS.c
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct runqueue q, r;
>>>  struct initd {
>>>  struct ustream_fd fd;
>>>  struct runqueue_process proc;
>>> + struct timeval tv_start;
>>>  char *file;
>>>  char *param;
>>>  };
>>> @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ static void q_initd_run(struct runqueue *q, struct 
>>> runqueue_task *t)
>>>  int pipefd[2];
>>>  pid_t pid;
>>>  + gettimeofday(&s->tv_start, NULL);
>>>  DEBUG(2, "start %s %s \n", s->file, s->param);
>>>  if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
>>>  ERROR("Failed to create pipe: %m\n");
>>> @@ -106,8 +108,11 @@ static void q_initd_run(struct runqueue *q, 
>>> struct runqueue_task *t)
>>>  static void q_initd_complete(struct runqueue *q, struct 
>>> runqueue_task *p)
>>>  {
>>>  struct initd *s = container_of(p, struct initd, proc.task);
>>> + struct timeval tv_stop, tv_res;
>>>  - DEBUG(2, "stop %s %s \n", s->file, s->param);
>>> + gettimeofday(&tv_stop, NULL);
>>> + timersub(&tv_stop, &s->tv_start, &tv_res);
>>> + DEBUG(2, "stop %s %s - took %lu.%06lus\n", s->file, s->param, 
>>> tv_res.tv_sec, tv_res.tv_usec);
>>>  ustream_free(&s->fd.stream);
>>>  close(s->fd.fd.fd);
>>>  free(s);
>> Isn't it better to use a monotonic time source here to measure elapsed 
>> time?
>> |This way you avoid racing issues should NTP sync kick in during 
>> execution.
>>
>>
>> |||clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ...)||||
>
> that occurred to me aswell as i was just testing the patch inside a vm :-)
>
>   John

I considered that, but then it would require a bit more logic to do the
subtract, as clock_gettime uses a timespec not a timeval. Nothing
impossible ofcourse, but didn't want to increase the size too much for
debug output that isn't active in 99.9% of the installations.

clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ... ) is also affected by NTP and
adjtime(), so even that won't be 100% when the clock is adjusted.

Karl

_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Reply via email to