On 01/21/2018 07:54 AM, Christian Lamparter wrote:
On Saturday, January 20, 2018 1:27:04 AM CET gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
From: Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Initial beta release of the CT IPQ4019 firmware. Features are
similar to the CT 9984 firmware
+$(eval $(call BuildPackage,ath10k-firmware-qca4019-ct-htt))
+$(eval $(call BuildPackage,ath10k-firmware-qca4019-ct))
$(eval $(call BuildPackage,ath10k-firmware-qca9888-ct))
---
I applied the full series on top of the r5904 (see attached
diffconfig). But I ran into issues when selecting ath10k-ct
and ath10k-firmware-qca4019-ct during image creation.
So what's the recommended way to install these?
Are you able to un-select the default firmware? In that case, there should
be no issue with the board-2.bin?
I expect the use case is to install exactly one of the firmware targets.
If we take the board-2.bin out of the firmware install target, then users
would somehow have to know to install some sort of board-2.bin or similar
file, otherwise the driver still will not load.
Since some boards have their own custom board-2.bin, I'm not sure how to
automate this properly. But, if we just assume users will select the
right thing, then splitting board-2.bin out of the FW install target
should be OK I guess?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
