On 2/18/2018 21:26, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> On Feb 18, 2018, at 11:25 AM, Philip Prindeville >> <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Feb 18, 2018, at 2:27 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 20/06/17 19:13, Stefan Tomanek wrote: >>>> While sshd should be favoured over telnetd, having a telnet client on the >>>> router is useful for connecting to other devices in the same LAN. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.toma...@wertarbyte.de> >>> >>> sorry for the late reply, it has been discussed over and over and the >>> decision was made to not enable telnet by default. sorry ... >>> >>> John >> >> Too bad. While it’s a liability for logging in, it’s a great tool for >> testing remote services like HTTP, SMTP, IMAP, JetDirect printers, etc. > SNIP
looks like it is possible to keep the telnet applet only, not telnetd. if this is not wanted for size, is there an alternative to interact with a port pushing/receiving characters? ..ede _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
