On 7 May 2018 at 10:46, Felix Fietkau <n...@nbd.name> wrote: > On 2018-05-07 09:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> From: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl> >> >> Some maintainers prefer DTS files licensed under permissive license like >> MIT / BSD. As all DT bindings should be OS independent and DTS files are >> pretty separated from Linux code it probably makes sense to share them >> across projects. >> >> The safest solution is to use dual licensing: that way it stays clear >> these files can be used in GPL projects without depending on current >> belief of licenses compatibility. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <ra...@milecki.pl> > Some of these files are based on upstream GPL code, did you contact the > original authors already?
I wasn't aware of that. I assumed they are all John's work based on our quick IRC conversation: [09:08] <rmilecki> blogic: are you author for target/linux/ath79/dts/*.dts files? [09:08] <rmilecki> *of [09:14] <blogic> rmilecki: yes [09:14] <blogic> rmilecki: feel free to change the license text and push a fix -- Rafał _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
