On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:32 PM, ed <[email protected]> wrote:
> I switched from master to next branches using git and did an acprep
> update to rebuild, the resultant binary failed (segfaulted I think)
> and I needed to do a make clean; acprep update to get a runnable
> program.
>
> Switching branches should mark all affected libs and objects as out of
> date.

Ehh?  functionally, we are re-running ./configure as part of that
process, and generating new Makefile s

It may be technically possible to compuet a build dependency graph in
order to retain prior binary content, but it is not wise, nor a
productive use of time that might better be applied to doco and 'real'
features.  People who are testing build often, but this is not a
sensible use case to optimize

-- Russ herrold

Reply via email to