On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Simon Michael wrote:
> Also we might find it useful to specify more detailed account types some day,
> as Quicken/Gnucash do, I guess to adjust sign and terminology and perhaps
> function. It suggests something like "account-type TYPE ACCOUNTREGEX" ? Or,
> if it turns out detailed type is orthogonal to the major distinction above -
> I'm not sure - there might be "account-kind ..." as well.
For a long time I've had a feature request for "account definitions":
account NAME
kind <...>
commodity $
strict
etc. The type of mechanism you're suggesting would fit into that scheme as
well.
John
