Interesting, let me mull that over a little.
As site hoster I'd need to keep two up-to-date repo copies since SITE refers to NEXT/docs/* (and you could imagine it
referring to code too, eg for generated API docs.).
Contributors would benefit from needing to know about one repo instead of two, but they also would need to keep two repo
copies; or live with extra friction switching between working on code/docs and site.
On 3/3/12 11:05 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
Simon Michael<simon-jbxitmbj2llqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org> writes:
PS I thought of moving the website (currently at
https://github.com/simonmichael/ledger-website) into the main ledger
repo. Any arguments for or against ? The site serves ledger 2.x also, but
that shouldn't be a problem.
I have no problems with this, but rather than having it live within a
subdirectory of 'next' branch, I would give it its own 'website' branch, the
same as I do now for 'planning' and 'archive'. Just let me know if you'd like
me to set that up.
John
