Ok, thanks for the explanation. John Wiegley <[email protected]> escribió:
> >The manual is wrong in this case. [] in a value expression introduces >a >"literal date", i.e.: > > ; Date:: [2012/05/11] > However I have all my tags with amounts with the [...] and the journal parses well. I suppose that interpretes them like years. >This type of [] syntax is usable anywhere that value expressions are >used. >For example, in an automated transaction's query expression (the "expr" >causes >it to use full value expression syntax, not the more limited report >query >syntax): > > = expr date < [2012/05/11] > Good to know, this soft has infinity possibilities!
