Dear John, Thanks for replying.
John Wiegley <[email protected]> writes: > I could perhaps make account.date mean "the date of the latest posting > contained in the account which matched the limiting predicate". Would that > help? I agree that there should be consistency between those four > commands. It would certainly help me for what I was trying to do (see a balance of accounts with ongoing totals) but I also admit that there might be other ways to do it. I wouldn't want to suggest a change without fully understanding the implications. As a relatively new user, I did find the lack of consistency confusing, though. And now that you've explained it to me, it's pretty unclear to me from playing around how I would use a value expression to filter accounts by date -- I couldn't get it to accept timestamps or `[yyyy/mm/dd HH:MM:SS]'. So I guess it would make sense to me to change account.date, since it would allow it to be more easily accessed (again, unless I missed something). Thanks, Jesse
