I have not tried the default commodity specifier, but it should do the trick for you.
Empty string cannot be the name of a commodity. That would break lots of things. Is specifying the commodity on each value that onerous? Modify ledger to your hearts content, that is what open source is for! But I don't think it would be worth it to modify it for everyone. We have many international users that depend on it working the way it does. One of the points to a ledger is that it is human readable as well as machine readable. Too many hidden defaults make that difficult. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Harshad RJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:11 PM, John Wiegley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Uncommoditized numbers behave differently with respect to display-time >> truncation of values, and ways that are unpredictable to most people, it >> turns >> out. > > > Ok, so if I define a default commodity and then use undecorated numbers, is > this problem solved? > > If so, would it be possible to modify ledger to use a pre-defined commodity > as default? Can an empty string be the name of the commodity? > > thanks, > -- > Harshad RJ > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ledger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ enderw88.wordpress.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
