On Tue, Aug 6, 2013, at 4:04, Harshad RJ wrote: > > But isn't parse order an internal detail of the implementation? Different > parsers work differently, especially in the context of included files. > > I think, in the very least, parse order needs to be re-defined in user > terms, independent of implementation details.
You speak as if there is some kind of standard; but there are only multiple different implementations of a vaguely similar general idea. Implementation defines the detail. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
