So, is there any interest in this project? If not I won't waste my time. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Craig Earls <[email protected]> wrote: > My transactions are also all atomic. With the exception of a few > virtual transactions at the top order does no matter. > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Russell Adams > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I can see the point where commands which apply across many >> transactions (a manual optimization) are broken by sorting. My data >> has always been verbose and each txn is atomic, so sorting wasn't an >> issue. >> >> Thanks. > > -- > Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ > enderw88.wordpress.com
-- Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ enderw88.wordpress.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
