On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Zack Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > As an aside, if this is how UUID's are used in ledger, it's going to > confuse people that are used to UUID's being unique, randomly > generated, and meaningless (ala those generated by "uuidgen" or > similar), rather than meaningful matchable hashes of content. Maybe > calling them a "hash" or even better using the hash method as the name > ("md5", "sha1", etc.) would help disambiguate the situation.
Or maybe just "id" - either "hash" or "UUID" is are overly specific, and if all that's being done here is a straight text comparison (per John's "foo" example), the SQL-esque "id" (or even "uid") would be much less confusing. - Zack -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
