I'm having this exact same problem in Ledger 3.0.2-20140507, On Sunday, July 18, 2010 4:34:02 AM UTC+8, spiffytech wrote: > > When I run "ledger --forecast "d<[2011/01/01]" bal" I see expenses and > assets values in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Since I'm a > poor college student with $10k annual income, this is very wrong. > Running ledger --forecast "d<[2011/01/01]" print" shows dates all the > way to December 2037, the largest date a signed int epoch timestamp > can represent. Dividing the values from Balance by 27 (2037-2010) I > get the $10k annual for both Expenses and Assets. > > Using Register instead of Balance or Print stops at (nearly) the > correct date. If I use "d<[2011/01/01]" I do get a transaction on > January 1, 2011, which should not happen (< vs <=) > > Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? I'm using Ledger 2.6.2, > though someone in #ledger reported what sounds like the same problem > with 3.0.
-- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
