On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:13 PM, John Wiegley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>> Martin Blais <[email protected]> writes: > > > On a related note: why are balance assertions tied to a transaction? In > > Beancount I treat them as a distinct directive, e.g.: > > > 2014-06-30 balance Assets:Some:Account 10 EUR > > Because tying them to transactions is more general. I can mimick your > standalone assertion by just having a transaction that does nothing else > but > assert a balance. Sure, but then a transaction that does nothing would appear in the register, no? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
