On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Martin Blais <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, John Wiegley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> My credit card statements regularly have transactions within one day, for >> which other transactions on that same day occur only on the next >> statement. >> Hence, not having intra-day assertions would mean I couldn't make use of >> assertions to help manage reconciliation of statements (my primary use of >> them, in fact). >> >> The goal of Ledger has always been flexibility first, allowing users to >> define >> their own semantics. I recognize that Beancount is much more oriented >> toward >> an accounting-centric semantics for the sake of that use case. This is a >> healthy division, and I think a cross-pollinating one too. >> > > I don't think how that lets users define their own semantics. > Sorry I fat-fingered the send button, I meant: I don't see how this lets users define their own semantics. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
