On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Martin Blais <[email protected]> wrote:

> The numbers reported do sum up exactly to 0.
> This is probably due to some of the postings being auto-generated from a
> rule, with some arithmetic operations resulting in fractions not being
> displayed.
>
> (The correct way to handle this would be to specify what the precision
> (rounding) of those operations should be.)
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 3:43 AM, o1bigtenor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Craig Earls <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Internally ledger does not need to round because it uses exact ratios
>> of
>> >> integers. Rounding only occurs when the amounts are formatted for
>> display.
>> >> If you could post the transaction that you are using it would help.
>> The
>> >> verbal description of the transaction doesn't have enough detail.
>> >>
>> >
>> >  2013.01.26    Costco
>> >     Expenses: Membership: xxxxxxxxxxxx                        $
>> 55.00
>> >     Expenses: GST -- business: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                  $
>>  2.75
>> >     Expenses: xxxxxxxxxxx: xxxxxxxxxxxx                        $
>> 36.36
>> >     Expenses: GST -- personal: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                   $
>>  1.70
>> >     Expenses: xxxxxx: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                        $
>> 53.48
>> >     Expenses: GST -- personal: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                    $
>>  2.50
>> >     Expenses: xxxxxxxxxxxx: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                      $
>>  7.80
>> >     Expenses: GST -- personal: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                    $
>>  0.36
>> >     Expenses: xxxxxxxxxxxx: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                    $
>> 15.50
>> >     Expenses: GST -- personal: xxxxxxxxxxxxx                    $
>>  0.72
>> >     Expenses: xxxxxxxxx: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 $
>> 10.69
>> >     Expenses: GST -- personal: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                    $
>> > 0.50
>> >     Expenses: Food -- home: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       $
>> > 75.80
>> >     Assets: xxxxxxxxxx: 1002.90.00.50                               $
>> > -263.16
>> >
>> >
>> > Some of the items that have GST (federal sales tax) charges have also
>> (here
>> > included in the cost) a provincial sales tax.
>> >
>>
> Sorry - - - getting back to emails after being away.

Items 2,3,4 and 6 (IIRC) actually contain a PST.

Procedure :

Item is noted
examined for PST and/or GST requirements
individual PST and/or GST amounts are NOT provided
item amount is multiplied by the factor to arrive at the amount (now
including the PST)
              this amount is rounded using the if its 0.5000 or greater up,
if less down rule

The individual calculations (with their attendant rounding) results in
small amounts of error.
The actual amount paid was $75.79 but with that there was an error of $0.01.
Amounts are not balanced so the Assets file was modified to eliminate the
error.

Error is because vendor (if I'm understanding things correctly) adds all
amounts and then
calculates PST and GST. This doesn't work when the items are individually
entered.
(Some clueless vendors actually charge a tax on a tax too!)

Dee

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to