I use it every day and don't see anything like this. What emacs are you using?
On Friday, October 31, 2014, Paul W. Rankin <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry to say, but the changes from 3.0 to 3.1 have utterly destroyed > syntax highlighting in ledger.el. I've had a perusal of the commits on > GitHub and it looks like there has been an attempt to switch away from > Font Lock Mode. I gotta say, this development has not produced a stable > version of ledger.el and I would *beg* a reversion for the stable > release. > > The problems are myriad, but I'll try to summarise: > > - I have a series of periodic trasactions. This series is fonitifed as > three different faces: > - some as ledger-font-xact-highlight-face (overlay and text property) > - some as comments but lack the comment face text property > - remainder in no face (but have text property fontified t) > > - I have 4 commodity lines, each gets a different face > (font-lock-fontify-block will clear all of these) > > - random transaction are fontified as ledger-font-comment-face > > - transactions with effective dates are not fontified > > - transactions with no amount on the first account line and amount of > second account line will fontify the second account line as > ledger-font-posting-amount-face > > - transactions with effective date will highlight transaction above with > ledger-font-xact-highlight-face instead of current transaction > > - automated transactions are not fontified > > COMMENTS! > > - comments are sometimes fontified, sometimes not > (font-lock-fontify-block will cause comments to change sporadically, > back and forth without much of a pattern, sorry I can't be more > specific) > > - sometimes a transaction will be in a random face, then fontifying will > result in ledger-font-comment-face > > - comment-dwim will prompt "No comment syntax is defined. Use:" > > As you can see, there are more issues than makes sense to submit > multiple bug reports. I'm not sure where the wisdom lay to move away > from Font Lock, but the replacement is far from ready for stable > release. > > In the interim, can I request the commit hash immediately before the big > switch? I gotta get a stable version... > > > -- > Paul W. Rankin > http://www.paulwrankin.com > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ledger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:;>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Craig, Corona De Tucson, AZ enderw88.wordpress.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
