>>>>> Alexis <[email protected]> writes: > John and I agreed to follow the git-flowน model for development, which means > the master branch will only see updates when a new version is released as of > now and development will happen on the next branch, so please make pull > request against next from now on.
Thanks for all your hard work, Alexis! The only thing I wanted to mention about git-flow, and the reason it was abandoned previously: is that releases were far and few between, and so master was stagnating and everyone was starting to use the next branch directly anyway (thus next became the new master). So I think that if we want git-flow to be successful for us, we should be committed to fairly frequent releases on the master branch, which may likely mean we move to a four-point version number and do point releases on a weekly or semiweekly basis. How does that sound? Essentially, any time you have a build which passes all tests and you think is sane, it's a candidate for a mini-release to master. John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
