On 04/26/2016 02:39 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
>
> The Python bindings are indeed a weak point within the implementation of
> C++Ledger. If anyone wants to take over maintenance of that part of the code,
> they would be most welcome. Until then, I don't think that state of affairs
> will change anytime soon.
>
> You may prefer Beancount, which is implemented in Python.
For purely selfish reasons (less work for me), I would prefer the Python
bindings to be better with Ledger. It does look like Beancount is
winning here... and in many other senses.
--
Rudd-O
http://rudd-o.com/
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
