Personally I would love to hear why the cleared and uncleared subaccount
system is better. Is it just because of being able to add a date? You can
add a second "effective" date to a transaction like this[1]:
2008/01/01=2008/01/15 Client invoice ; actual date money received
Assets:Accounts Receivable $100.00
Income: Client name
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Peter McArthur <[email protected]>
wrote:
> No, I don’t like the cleared flag.
>
> The traditional approach to account reconciliation works very well for
> pen-and-paper systems, but when your accounts are computerised, the
> :cleared and :uncleared sub-account approach makes more sense. I’ll be
> happy to go into more detail if you’re interested.
>
> But I like the syntax highlighting idea and, while I don’t use the cleared
> flag, I do use the pending flag to mark all unconfirmed transactions, so I
> think I’ll add that to my editor’s highlighting rules. Thanks for the tip!
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ledger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
