There were several very interesting articles on this topic recently. I will here share just this one. It tells a lot about Go.
https://fasterthanli.me/articles/lies-we-tell-ourselves-to-keep-using-golang#the-author-is-a-platypus I'll just add that I'm happy with my instinctive choice between the two languages. On Wednesday, 14 December 2022 at 5:14:58 am UTC+1 Daryl Manning wrote: > Out of curiosity, why was Rust chosen vs. say, Go? While I'm happy to see > efforts at porting and replacing C++ (which makies it hard to contribute), > I find Rust has the same issues with high learning curve to get productive > (not to mention "sub-langs" within it) and ake contribution from a wider > audience harder. > > Don't get me wrong. I like Rust. A lot. Just not so sure I wouldn't have > ported to Go depending on the goals of why we're switching languages. > (that said Rust > C++ from my perspective if you're making the change... > =] ). > > On Tuesday, 13 December 2022 at 23:17:28 UTC+7 cick0 wrote: > >> Hi! I'd like to post here, as well, regarding the "toe-in-the-water" >> efforts of porting Ledger to Rust. >> The usual suspects are familiar with it from the Reddit channel but for >> those that only frequent this group, it may be news. >> >> I have created a repository for discussing issues here: >> https://github.com/alensiljak/ledger-cli-rs/ >> >> Please join in if you are interested. Do note that this is not intended >> as yet-another-ledger-port-attempt, but more as pooling with the goal of >> producing the definitive Ledger port and successor, drawing from the >> initial thread on Reddit. >> > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/df23e98f-cf66-4c54-a9e7-23db75b30ea2n%40googlegroups.com.
